Politically Incorrect News and Views

Your Conservative home for 2nd Amendment, Political and National Discussion
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Time & Date CST
html code for clock
Sight Supporters
free forum
Forum Theme Songs
Join the NRA
Latest topics
» 9MM Carbine
Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:14 am by Alley_Oop Mod/Admin

» JOE SCARBOROUGH, PIERS MORGAN: OBAMA SCANDALS PROVE GUN ADVOCATES AREN'T CRAZY
Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:13 am by UncleFrank

» California Approves $92M Ammo Tax To Combat Gun Violence
Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:07 am by UncleFrank

» Benghazi as Lazarus, Back from the Dead
Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:03 am by UncleFrank

» Georgia Gov. Deal orders Bibles returned to state-owned park
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:57 am by UncleFrank

» STATE DOJ: BUSTS REVEAL UNPRECEDENTED CARTEL PRESENCE IN OREGON
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:54 am by UncleFrank

» North Korea fires three short-range missiles as Japan envoy pays “secret” visit
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:46 am by UncleFrank

» WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS BLAME STATE FOR NOT DEPLOYING RAPID-RESPONSE TERROR UNIT TO BENGHAZI
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:42 am by UncleFrank

» Obama Is No Richard Nixon
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:37 am by UncleFrank

» Obama Keeps Eyes on The Prize in 2014
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:50 am by UncleFrank

» Benghazi Ghosts Haunt Whitehouse
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:47 am by UncleFrank

» Obama’s Constitutionally-Challenged Labor Board Silent After Losing Another Legal Battle
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:44 am by UncleFrank

» 7 Things We Learned from the Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:43 am by UncleFrank

» Four More Things We've Learned
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:41 am by UncleFrank

» Five Key Points from Today's Benghazi Hearing (So Far)
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:39 am by UncleFrank

» DOJ: We don't need warrants for e-mail, Facebook chats
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:38 am by UncleFrank

» When An Old Soldier Dies
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:35 am by UncleFrank

» Presence of Malice: Against the Conservative Portrait of the President
Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:39 am by UncleFrank

» DEM SENATOR: 2ND AMENDMENT NOT 'ABSOLUTE' OR 'GOD-GIVEN RIGHT'
Wed May 22, 2013 3:07 pm by UncleFrank

» NRA Convention Protesters: Nice, Clueless, Unsure
Wed May 22, 2013 3:06 pm by UncleFrank

New Videos
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Forum

Share | 
 

 Idaho's new stance

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
VietVet68
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member


Posts : 1694
Join date : 2010-02-24
Age : 68
Location : Michigan

PostSubject: Idaho's new stance   Mon May 03, 2010 1:25 pm

I just discovered that the Governor of Idaho signed "Senate File 2379." This changes Idaho from a "May Issue" state to a "Shall Issue" state.
According to NRA stat's here's how all states breakdown:

38 Shall Issue States
3 No Permit required
2 Reasonable Issue
7 Rights Restricted
2 Non Issue

John
Back to top Go down
Freedom
Admin
avatar

Posts : 406
Join date : 2010-02-05

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Mon May 03, 2010 8:15 pm

Good. Seems that some states, despite the koolaid drinking, still have some of the God given reason left.

I use to think it would be good if there were a Federal law nation wide giving all states CCW rights.

Now I realize just how wrong and bad that would have been. These issues ARE States Rights issues, and should stay States Rights Issues.
And the Fed needs to keep their noses out.

_________________
The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Politically Incorrect and Proud.
God Bless the USA and our Troops everywhere.
The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights are written in stone, they as well as the Christian Scriptures need no editing nor changes !!
Back to top Go down
http://firearmsforumcoali.motionsforum.com
VietVet68
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member


Posts : 1694
Join date : 2010-02-24
Age : 68
Location : Michigan

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Tue May 04, 2010 8:28 am

I'm pretty certain that last year the Federal Law came within just a few votes of becoming reality. At the time I thought it was a good idea because the continuity would clear up all the ambiguity between each states own rules and law enforcement and civilians would both know the rules.
I am open minded about it though and would like to know the reasons behind your position, maybe I'll learn a few things. As the old saying goes, "I only know what I know, & I don't know what I don't know."
Back to top Go down
Freedom
Admin
avatar

Posts : 406
Join date : 2010-02-05

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Tue May 04, 2010 12:54 pm

Right now, all the states that have CCW control it from the state. 10th amendment.
If the feds instated a nation wide CCW law that would be one more thing that the Fed has taken over, and the control out of the hands of the states and local government.

The Fed is to big, and infringing on and in to the areas of control not delegated to them through the Constitution. This would have been one more power grab at the federal level.
Someone like Obama would be able to shut the nationwide CCW down sending the country right back to where it was in the beginning, before any of the states had CCW.

The Fed through the Constitution has limited responsibilities. It needs to stay that way. They have stuck their noses in to far as it is.
Let the states deal with CCW. When crime becomes soooooo bad that the people in that state have just had to much they will vote in people that will change the laws and instate CCW.

Thats my view right now.

_________________
The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Politically Incorrect and Proud.
God Bless the USA and our Troops everywhere.
The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights are written in stone, they as well as the Christian Scriptures need no editing nor changes !!


Last edited by Centinul on Thu May 06, 2010 4:59 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
http://firearmsforumcoali.motionsforum.com
VietVet68
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member


Posts : 1694
Join date : 2010-02-24
Age : 68
Location : Michigan

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Tue May 04, 2010 3:08 pm

OK, now that I know that I'll change my mind and ride on your side of the road, thanks.
Back to top Go down
Gramps
Member


Posts : 74
Join date : 2010-02-17
Location : Somewhere, MO.

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Fri May 21, 2010 10:12 am

CCW laws must come from the state level, but recipriocity, like acceptance of drivers licenses should be a nation wide issue. In other words, if you are granted CCW in any state of our country, that permit MUST be accepted by any other state. If they want to make it difficult for the citizens of their state to ccw, then that is their business. But they cannot interfer with the ccw right of citizens of other states that have a legal permit from their state.

How about deem apples?
Back to top Go down
VietVet68
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member


Posts : 1694
Join date : 2010-02-24
Age : 68
Location : Michigan

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Fri May 21, 2010 12:22 pm

In Michigan the politicians here are discussing the issue of possibly putting your CPL on the reverse side of our drivers license. I think it's something worthy of discussion and would support it.
National reciprocity is something that needs to happen.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Sun May 23, 2010 2:16 pm

It is something that needs to happen but as discussed, it needs to happen at the State level. Not Federal. The Federal Government needs to stay out of the States affairs.

As for the CCW and where to put it. Some states will give you the option to put the CCW endorsement on your Drivers license or opt to put it on a State ID.
Reason? Some shop keeps will ask for your ID from time to time, and if they do, there is no need to freak anyone out, or let them know that you MIGHT be carrying that day or the like.
Back to top Go down
VietVet68
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member


Posts : 1694
Join date : 2010-02-24
Age : 68
Location : Michigan

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Mon May 24, 2010 2:28 pm

Yes---at the State level. And, people should learn not to get freaked out if they see a CPL, for Christ's sake what would they do if they saw a gun!!!
Back to top Go down
Gramps
Member


Posts : 74
Join date : 2010-02-17
Location : Somewhere, MO.

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Mon May 24, 2010 9:36 pm

Well, From past experiences of others, when a gun is seen they call the police. Then comes the hassles and charges. Our society has become ingrained that to see a gun on someone, makes that person a threat to all. Doesn't matter if the person with the gun is the most upstanding citizen around, he immediately becomes a criminal threat.
Back to top Go down
Freedom
Admin
avatar

Posts : 406
Join date : 2010-02-05

PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   Tue May 25, 2010 4:55 am

Bingo

_________________
The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Politically Incorrect and Proud.
God Bless the USA and our Troops everywhere.
The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights are written in stone, they as well as the Christian Scriptures need no editing nor changes !!
Back to top Go down
http://firearmsforumcoali.motionsforum.com
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Idaho's new stance   

Back to top Go down
 
Idaho's new stance
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Politically Incorrect News and Views :: Where the United States of America started :: The 10 Amendments to the Bill of Rights and What came next-
Jump to: