Politically Incorrect News and Views

Your Conservative home for 2nd Amendment, Political and National Discussion
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Time & Date CST
html code for clock
Sight Supporters
free forum
Forum Theme Songs
Join the NRA
Latest topics
» 9MM Carbine
Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:14 am by Alley_Oop Mod/Admin

» JOE SCARBOROUGH, PIERS MORGAN: OBAMA SCANDALS PROVE GUN ADVOCATES AREN'T CRAZY
Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:13 am by UncleFrank

» California Approves $92M Ammo Tax To Combat Gun Violence
Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:07 am by UncleFrank

» Benghazi as Lazarus, Back from the Dead
Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:03 am by UncleFrank

» Georgia Gov. Deal orders Bibles returned to state-owned park
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:57 am by UncleFrank

» STATE DOJ: BUSTS REVEAL UNPRECEDENTED CARTEL PRESENCE IN OREGON
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:54 am by UncleFrank

» North Korea fires three short-range missiles as Japan envoy pays “secret” visit
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:46 am by UncleFrank

» WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS BLAME STATE FOR NOT DEPLOYING RAPID-RESPONSE TERROR UNIT TO BENGHAZI
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:42 am by UncleFrank

» Obama Is No Richard Nixon
Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:37 am by UncleFrank

» Obama Keeps Eyes on The Prize in 2014
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:50 am by UncleFrank

» Benghazi Ghosts Haunt Whitehouse
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:47 am by UncleFrank

» Obama’s Constitutionally-Challenged Labor Board Silent After Losing Another Legal Battle
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:44 am by UncleFrank

» 7 Things We Learned from the Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:43 am by UncleFrank

» Four More Things We've Learned
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:41 am by UncleFrank

» Five Key Points from Today's Benghazi Hearing (So Far)
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:39 am by UncleFrank

» DOJ: We don't need warrants for e-mail, Facebook chats
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:38 am by UncleFrank

» When An Old Soldier Dies
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:35 am by UncleFrank

» Presence of Malice: Against the Conservative Portrait of the President
Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:39 am by UncleFrank

» DEM SENATOR: 2ND AMENDMENT NOT 'ABSOLUTE' OR 'GOD-GIVEN RIGHT'
Wed May 22, 2013 3:07 pm by UncleFrank

» NRA Convention Protesters: Nice, Clueless, Unsure
Wed May 22, 2013 3:06 pm by UncleFrank

New Videos
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Forum

Share | 
 

 NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Alley_Oop Mod/Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 15226
Join date : 2010-06-06
Age : 69
Location : Denton

PostSubject: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:45 pm

NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N.
Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty

National Rifle Association's Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre addressed the United Nations this afternoon.

This was delivered to my email address by the NRA this afternoon as a NRA-ILA Alert. I thought it important enough to share with everyone so at least we know for the time being the NRA is speaking out for us on gun rights and for the government not to interfere with them!



United Nations Arms Trade Treaty

Preparatory Committee - 3d Session

New York, July 11-15, 2011



Statement of the National Rifle Association of America



Mr. Chairman, thank you for this brief opportunity to address the committee. I am Wayne LaPierre and for 20 years now, I have served as Executive Vice President of the National Rifle Association of America.



The NRA was founded in 1871, and ever since has staunchly defended the rights of its 4 million members, America's 80 million law-abiding gun owners, and freedom-loving Americans throughout our country. In 1996, the NRA was recognized as an NGO of the United Nations and, ever since then, has defended the constitutional freedom of Americans in this arena. The NRA is the largest and most active firearms rights organization in the world and, although some members of this committee may not like what I have to say, I am proud to defend the tens of millions of lawful people NRA represents.



This present effort for an Arms Trade Treaty, or ATT, is now in its fifth year. We have closely monitored this process with increasing concern. We've reviewed the statements of the countries participating in these meetings. We've listened to other NGOs and read their numerous proposals and reports, as well as carefully examined the papers you have produced. We've watched, and read ... listened and monitored. Now, we must speak out.



The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in defense of self, family and country is ultimately self-evident and is part of the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution. Reduced to its core, it is about fundamental individual freedom, human worth, and self-destiny.



We reject the notion that American gun owners must accept any lesser amount of freedom in order to be accepted among the international community. Our Founding Fathers long ago rejected that notion and forged our great nation on the principle of freedom for the individual citizen - not for the government.



Mr. Chairman, those working on this treaty have asked us to trust them ... but they've proven to be unworthy of that trust.



We are told "Trust us; an ATT will not ban possession of any civilian firearms." Yet, the

proposals and statements presented to date have argued exactly the opposite, and - perhaps most importantly - proposals to ban civilian firearms ownership have not been rejected.



We are told "Trust us; an ATT will not interfere with state domestic regulation of firearms." Yet, there are constant calls for exactly such measures.



We are told "Trust us; an ATT will only affect the illegal trade in firearms." But then we're told that in order to control the illegal trade, all states must control the legal firearms trade.



We are told, "Trust us; an ATT will not require registration of civilian firearms." Yet, there are numerous calls for record-keeping, and firearms tracking from production to eventual destruction. That's nothing more than gun registration by a different name.



We are told, "Trust us; an ATT will not create a new international bureaucracy." Well, that's exactly what is now being proposed -- with a tongue-in-cheek assurance that it will just be a SMALL bureaucracy.



We are told, "Trust us; an ATT will not interfere with the lawful international commerce in civilian firearms." But a manufacturer of civilian shotguns would have to comply with the same regulatory process as a manufacturer of military attack helicopters.



We are told, "Trust us; an ATT will not interfere with a hunter or sport shooter travelling internationally with firearms." However, he would have to get a so-called "transit permit" merely to change airports for a connecting flight.



Mr. Chairman, our list of objections extends far beyond the proposals I just mentioned.

Unfortunately, my limited time today prevents me from providing greater detail on each of our objections. I can assure you, however, that each is based on American law, as well as the fundamental rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.



It is regrettable that proposals affecting civilian firearms ownership are woven throughout the proposed ATT. That being the case, however, there is only one solution to this problem: the complete removal of civilian firearms from the scope of any ATT. I will repeat that point as it is critical and not subject to negotiation - civilian firearms must not be part of any ATT. On this there can be no compromise, as American gun owners will never surrender their Second Amendment freedom.



It is also regrettable to find such intense focus on record-keeping, oversight, inspections, supervision, tracking, tracing, surveillance, marking, documentation, verification, paper trails and data banks, new global agencies and data centers. Nowhere do we find a thought about respecting anyone's right of self-defense, privacy, property, due process, or observing personal freedoms of any kind.



Mr. Chairman, I'd be remiss if I didn't also discuss the politics of an ATT. For the United States to be a party to an ATT, it must be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the U.S. Senate. Some do not realize that under the U.S. Constitution, the ultimate treaty power is not the President's power to negotiate and sign treaties; it is the Senate's power to approve them.



To that end, it's important for the Preparatory Committee to understand that the proposed ATT is already strongly opposed in the Senate - the very body that must approve it by a two-thirds majority. There is a letter addressed to President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton that is currently being circulated for the signatures of Senators who oppose the ATT. Once complete, this letter will demonstrate that the proposed ATT will not pass the U.S. Senate.



So there is extremely strong resistance to the ATT in the United States, even before the treaty is tabled. We are not aware of any precedent for this - rejecting a proposed treaty before it's even submitted for consideration - but it speaks to the level of opposition. The proposed ATT has become more than just controversial, as the Internet is awash with articles and messages calling for its rejection. And those messages are all based on the same objection - infringement on the constitutional freedom of American gun owners.



The cornerstone of our freedom is the Second Amendment. Neither the United Nations, nor any other foreign influence, has the authority to meddle with the freedoms guaranteed by our Bill of Rights, endowed by our Creator, and due to all humankind.



Therefore, the NRA will fight with all of its strength to oppose any ATT that includes civilian firearms within its scope.



Thank you.

_________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - Benefactor Life NRA - Concealed Handgun Instructor Texas

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU DON'T GET WHAT YOU WANTED!

There are only two defining forces that have ever offered to die for you!
Jesus Christ for your soul and the American Soldier for your freedom!
Back to top Go down
http://texasconcealedhandguninstructor.com
Alley_Oop Mod/Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 15226
Join date : 2010-06-06
Age : 69
Location : Denton

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:08 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Update to the article was just emailed to me. Go here to read the complete article.

_________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - Benefactor Life NRA - Concealed Handgun Instructor Texas

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU DON'T GET WHAT YOU WANTED!

There are only two defining forces that have ever offered to die for you!
Jesus Christ for your soul and the American Soldier for your freedom!
Back to top Go down
http://texasconcealedhandguninstructor.com
UncleFrank
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member
avatar

Posts : 11868
Join date : 2010-07-25
Age : 67
Location : Commie occupied N.J.

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:59 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
UncleFrank
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member
avatar

Posts : 11868
Join date : 2010-07-25
Age : 67
Location : Commie occupied N.J.

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:04 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Alley_Oop Mod/Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 15226
Join date : 2010-06-06
Age : 69
Location : Denton

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Sat Jul 16, 2011 5:06 am

What Little Hitler is trying to do is put us back over 200 years!!! I am not buying it and the NRA may not be the best organization that exists, but they sure as hell stood up to the folks at the UN where the treaty is being tossed around and told them not no but hell no!!! We need more folks and organizations like that to stand up to the tyrant and tell him to go away!!! JMHO!!

_________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - Benefactor Life NRA - Concealed Handgun Instructor Texas

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU DON'T GET WHAT YOU WANTED!

There are only two defining forces that have ever offered to die for you!
Jesus Christ for your soul and the American Soldier for your freedom!
Back to top Go down
http://texasconcealedhandguninstructor.com
UncleFrank
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member
avatar

Posts : 11868
Join date : 2010-07-25
Age : 67
Location : Commie occupied N.J.

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:37 pm

At least the NRA is stepping up to the plate. Where's the other organizations???
Back to top Go down
Alley_Oop Mod/Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 15226
Join date : 2010-06-06
Age : 69
Location : Denton

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Sat Jul 16, 2011 7:36 pm

Don't know!!! All this hooplah about the others coming of age and beginning to stand up for gun rights and I am like you! Where the hell are they???

_________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - Benefactor Life NRA - Concealed Handgun Instructor Texas

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU DON'T GET WHAT YOU WANTED!

There are only two defining forces that have ever offered to die for you!
Jesus Christ for your soul and the American Soldier for your freedom!
Back to top Go down
http://texasconcealedhandguninstructor.com
UncleFrank
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member
avatar

Posts : 11868
Join date : 2010-07-25
Age : 67
Location : Commie occupied N.J.

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:08 am

I have not heard a peep out of them. They are quick to pick your pocket though.
Back to top Go down
Alley_Oop Mod/Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 15226
Join date : 2010-06-06
Age : 69
Location : Denton

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Sun Jul 17, 2011 9:15 am

NRA is not perfect by any means! However, they are the 800 pound gorilla out there as far as gun rights are concerned. When the NRA speaks somebody better pay attention!! JMHO!!

_________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - Benefactor Life NRA - Concealed Handgun Instructor Texas

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU DON'T GET WHAT YOU WANTED!

There are only two defining forces that have ever offered to die for you!
Jesus Christ for your soul and the American Soldier for your freedom!
Back to top Go down
http://texasconcealedhandguninstructor.com
UncleFrank
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member
avatar

Posts : 11868
Join date : 2010-07-25
Age : 67
Location : Commie occupied N.J.

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Mon Jul 18, 2011 3:16 pm

We need a few gorillas on our side, like they say, there is strength in numbers.
Back to top Go down
Alley_Oop Mod/Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 15226
Join date : 2010-06-06
Age : 69
Location : Denton

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Mon Jul 18, 2011 3:38 pm

I still have not heard any of the other groups take any stand one way or another on this treaty thing! Bunch of pantywaists in my view! You have to get off the front porch if you want to hunt with the big dogs!!! LMAO!!

_________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - Benefactor Life NRA - Concealed Handgun Instructor Texas

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU DON'T GET WHAT YOU WANTED!

There are only two defining forces that have ever offered to die for you!
Jesus Christ for your soul and the American Soldier for your freedom!
Back to top Go down
http://texasconcealedhandguninstructor.com
UncleFrank
Honored Armed Service Member
Honored Armed Service Member
avatar

Posts : 11868
Join date : 2010-07-25
Age : 67
Location : Commie occupied N.J.

PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   Mon Jul 18, 2011 3:46 pm

Their pockets must be sown shut, cant get any money out of a sealed pocket. GGG
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty   

Back to top Go down
 
NRA Delivers Remarks at U.N. Concerning Proposed Arms Trade Treaty
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Wood Elf 2250 Final revision....remarks PLEASE!!!
» "Puppets War" TL Autocannon arms
» D'oh!!! AC Arms
» Brothers in Arms: Furious 4. Is this the right move to make?
» Twin-Linked Autocannon Dreadnought Arms

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Politically Incorrect News and Views :: FFC Forums :: General Discusions for The FFC :: The Political Arena-
Jump to: